抗体和抗原有什么区别| 吃什么会导致流产| 口缘字一半念什么| 无犯罪证明需要什么材料| 红细胞分布宽度偏低是什么原因| 胎儿胆囊偏小有什么影响| 脾胃有火是什么症状| wtf什么意思| ckd是什么意思| 怀孕检查挂什么科| 女性为什么不适合喝茉莉花茶| 追剧是什么意思| 山药吃了有什么好处| 阴道内痒是什么原因| 4月4日是什么日子| 月经来的少是什么原因| 四月二号是什么星座| 小孩经常口腔溃疡是什么原因| 阴茎勃起不硬吃什么| 吃过榴莲不能吃什么| 头疼吃什么药| 师长相当于地方什么级别| ipmn是什么意思| 疱疹长什么样| barry是什么意思| 嗜什么意思| 舌头有麻木感什么原因| 旧加一笔是什么字| 二聚体偏高是什么原因| yankees是什么牌子| 大作是什么意思| 鲈鱼是什么鱼| 71岁属什么| 线下培训是什么意思| juicy是什么意思| 溃疡性结肠炎吃什么药| 吃什么油好| 检查骨密度挂什么科| 面部神经挂什么科| 肾积水有什么危害| 荡是什么意思| 木薯粉是什么东西| 溃疡是什么意思| 淋症是什么意思| 儿童内分泌科检查什么| 如梦初醒是什么意思| 法盲是什么意思| 拔罐是什么意思| 嗓子疼不能吃什么| 反胃酸是什么原因| 长期熬夜吃什么可以补回来| 慈禧和光绪是什么关系| 一个月大的小狗吃什么| 容易长痣是什么原因| 阴囊潮湿是什么原因造成的| cod是什么| 要强是什么意思| 硬脂酸是什么| 口舌生疮吃什么药最见效| 黑脸娃娃有什么功效| 尿酸过高是什么原因| 中元节是什么节日| dha什么时间段吃最好| 肠道菌群失调吃什么药| 大肠杆菌吃什么药| 动态是什么意思| 今年什么时间进伏| 每晚做梦是什么原因| 凌霄什么意思| 麻油是什么| 新西兰用什么货币| 财不外露什么意思| 还珠格格什么时候上映的| 黄瓜为什么不叫绿瓜| 头部ct能检查出什么| 什么是血浆| 什么是暗物质| 狮子被称为什么| 热痱子是什么样子图片| 做肺部ct挂什么科| 什么减肥产品最好| 聂的拼音是什么| 7月17号什么星座| 什么是伪娘| 10.1是什么星座| 民兵是干什么的| 糖代谢增高是什么意思| 梦见别人打我是什么意思| app是什么意思啊| 36计的第一计是什么| 翻墙是什么意思| 什么是假性狐臭| 吃什么对痔疮好得快| 妯娌关系是什么意思| 妇联是干什么的| 拔牙后不能吃什么食物| 灵芝泡水喝有什么好处| 什么是中国舞| 肠胃炎可以吃什么药| 金银花有什么效果| 枸杞有什么作用和功效| 胃炎适合吃什么食物| 月经褐色是什么原因| 小腿麻木是什么原因| 桃子可以做什么美食| 什么手什么脚| 急性肠胃炎是什么引起的| 牛油果和什么榨汁好喝| 胡人是什么民族| 急性阑尾炎什么症状| 数不胜数的胜是什么意思| 为什么韩国叫棒子国| 避孕药什么时候吃有效| 比劫是什么意思| lbs什么意思| 吃什么东西补血最快| 这个故事告诉我们什么道理| 脚发痒是什么原因| 熬粥用什么锅好| 四月18号是什么星座的| 天伦之乐是什么意思| 王不见王是什么意思| 谷丙转氨酶偏高吃什么好| 胃酸是什么颜色的| 痔疮吃什么药效果好| 一九九二年属什么生肖| 好无奈是什么意思| 一什么明珠| 什么是腐女| 肉桂和桂皮有什么区别| 肚子发胀是什么原因| 骨显像主要检查什么| 沙示汽水有什么功效| 舔是什么意思| 前列腺肥大有什么症状| pink是什么颜色| lucy是什么意思| 国防部长是什么级别| 氨基丁酸是什么| 笑刑是什么| 孩子走路晚是什么原因| 什么入什么口| 神经病和精神病有什么区别| 胆固醇高吃什么可以降下来| 疱疹在什么情况下传染| 血糖高什么原因引起| 玄武岩属于什么岩石| 南京立冬吃什么| 馀是什么意思| 打胎药叫什么| 外阴有白色的东西是什么| 奕字五行属什么| 60岁是什么之年| 哆啦a梦大结局是什么| 梦见袜子破了是什么意思| 鹿晗的粉丝名叫什么| 心电图p是什么意思| 332是什么意思| 胃食管反流能吃什么水果| 上吐下泻吃什么药| rma是什么意思| 心肝火旺吃什么中成药| 什么属相不能挂山水画| 葡萄套袋前打什么药| 什么叫做质量| 极核是什么| 大姨妈来的少是什么原因| mri检查是什么意思| 黄水晶五行属什么| 我宣你 是什么意思| 起灵是什么意思| 乳房胀痛挂什么科| 慢性肠炎是什么症状| 肝病吃什么药| 肚子左下方是什么器官| 拉肚子吃什么药| 验血能查出什么| 为什么单位不愿意申请工伤| 弦脉是什么意思| 屁股抽筋疼是什么原因| 身体出汗多是什么原因| 腋毛癣用什么药膏最好| 什么东西吃了壮阳| 彩金是什么金| 脑血栓什么症状| 377是什么| 梦见涨水是什么兆头| 多吃苹果有什么好处| 栀子花叶子发黄是什么原因| 小拇指长痣代表什么| 脾胃不好喝什么茶| 缺铁性贫血吃什么食物好| hc是什么意思| 过午不食是什么意思| 男性b超检查什么项目| 妇科衣原体感染是什么病| 贡米是什么米| 高考300分能上什么大学| 家里为什么有小飞虫| sigma是什么牌子| 鹅是什么动物| 丙氨酸氨基转移酶高是什么意思| 2月24号是什么星座| 氯雷他定片主治什么| 今天是什么节日吗| 电泳是什么| 维生素c阴性什么意思| 肾有问题有什么症状| 节育环嵌顿是什么意思| 苏轼是什么派诗人| 凤毛麟角是什么生肖| 夜盲症缺什么维生素| 6月18号是什么日子| 落花雨你飘摇的美丽是什么歌| 三千年前是什么朝代| 世界上最多笔画的字是什么| 年柱将星是什么意思| 眼睛痒什么原因| 什么歌最好听| 糖耐量受损是什么意思| x射线是什么| 晚上口渴是什么原因引起的| 血管夹层是什么病| 对什么| 新生儿拉肚子是什么原因引起的| 二次元文化是什么意思| 血脂挂什么科| 培根是什么肉做的| ccr是什么意思| 干姜和生姜有什么区别| 马跟什么相冲| 眼角痒用什么眼药水好| 145是什么意思| 保姆是什么意思| 为什么晚上不能倒垃圾| 什么水果降血糖| 减肥应该吃什么| 兰花用什么肥料最好| 山药炒什么好吃| 阿司匹林治什么病| 眼睛充血是什么原因造成的| 5是什么生肖| 什么是短语| 2.25是什么星座| 过敏打什么针| crp高是什么感染| ins风格是什么| 武则天墓为什么不敢挖| 骨折的人吃什么恢复快| 胆码是什么意思| 怀孕胎盘低有什么影响| 反清复明的组织叫什么| 麻雀为什么跳着走| 观音得道日是什么时候| 关灯吃面什么意思| 杏子不能和什么一起吃| 3.9是什么星座| 玩票是什么意思| 紫阳茶属于什么茶| 医院属于什么单位| 出煞是什么意思| 号召是什么意思| 阴盛格阳是什么意思| ebay什么意思| 百度Jump to content

【平昌パラ】中国、冬季パラで初の金メダル 車いすカーリング

This is a good article. Click here for more information.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
百度 他同时还向与会嘉宾和各界朋友展示了充满活力、蓬勃发展的现代成都。

Homo erectus
Temporal range: 2–0.1 Ma
Pleistocene[1]
Java Man, the holotype of H. erectus[note 1]
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Mammalia
Order: Primates
Suborder: Haplorhini
Infraorder: Simiiformes
Family: Hominidae
Subfamily: Homininae
Tribe: Hominini
Genus: Homo
Species:
?H. erectus
Binomial name
?Homo erectus
(Dubois, 1893)

Homo erectus (/?ho?mo? ??r?kt?s/ lit.?'upright man') is an extinct species of archaic human from the Pleistocene, spanning nearly 2 million years. It is the first human species to evolve a humanlike body plan and gait, to leave Africa and colonize Asia and Europe, and to wield fire. H. erectus is the ancestor of later human species, including H. heidelbergensis — the last common ancestor of modern humans, Neanderthals, and Denisovans. As such a widely distributed species both geographically and temporally, H. erectus anatomy varies considerably. Subspecies are sometimes recognized: H. e. erectus, H. e. pekinensis, H. e. soloensis, H. e. ergaster, H. e. georgicus, and H. e. tautavelensis.

The species was first described by Eugène Dubois in 1893 as "Pithecanthropus erectus" using a skullcap, molar, and femur from Java, Indonesia. Further discoveries around East Asia were used to contend that humanity evolved out of Asia. Based on historical race concepts, it was argued that local H. erectus populations evolved directly into local modern human populations (polycentricism) rather than all humanity sharing a single anatomically modern ancestor (monogenism). As the fossil record improved over the mid-to-late 20th century, "Out of Africa" theory and monogenism became the consensus.

The typical skull has a pronounced brow ridge, a protruding jaw, and large teeth. The bones are much thicker than in modern humans. East Asian H. erectus normally has an even more robust skeleton and larger brain volume — averaging 1,000 cc (61 cu in). Western H. erectus brain volume could be as low as 546 cc (33.3 cu in) in H. e. georgicus. H. erectus probably had a faster apelike growth trajectory, lacking the extended childhood required for language acquisition. Reconstructed adult body dimensions range from 148–167 cm (4 ft 10 in – 5 ft 6 in) in height and about 50 kg (110 lb) in weight.

H. erectus invented the Acheulean tool industry, a major innovation of large, heavy-duty stone tools. These may have been used in butchery, vegetable processing, and woodworking of spears and digging sticks. H. erectus was a major predator of large herbivores on the expanding savannas during the Quaternary glaciation. The species is usually characterized as the first hunter-gatherer and the first to practice sexual division of labor. Fire usage and cave habitation were probably not important aspects of daily life. Similarly, H. erectus may not have often ventured into colder regions or cooked meat. The last occurrence of H. erectus is 108,000 to 117,000 years ago (H. e. soloensis) in Southeast Asia, until the last savannas in the region gave way to jungle.

Taxonomy

[edit]

Research history

[edit]
In 1868, Ernst Haeckel suggested early humans dispersed from the now-disproven hypothetical continent "Lemuria".[3][4]

While Charles Darwin had hypothesized in his 1871 Descent of Man that humans most likely evolved in Africa,[note 2] many late-19th century evolutionary naturalists postulated that Asia was the birthplace of humankind. Asia is midway between all continents via land routes or short sea crossings, providing optimal dispersal routes throughout the world. Among the major proponents of "Out of Asia" theory was Ernst Haeckel, who argued that the first human species (which he speculatively named Homo primigenius) evolved on a now-disproven hypothetical continent "Lemuria" from a species he termed Pithecanthropus alalus (speechless ape-man). "Lemuria" had supposedly sunk below the Indian Ocean, accounting for the lack of fossil evidence.[3]

Dutch scientist Eugène Dubois joined the Royal Netherlands East Indies Army to search for the "missing link" of human evolution in Java.[note 3] At the Trinil site, his team found a skullcap and molar in 1891, and a femur in 1892 (Java Man), which he named "Pithecanthropus erectus" in 1893.[7] He attempted to convince the European scientific community that he had found an upright-walking ape-man dating to the late Pliocene or Early Pleistocene; they dismissed his findings as some kind of non-human ape.[3]

Franz Weidenreich and Ralph von Koenigswald argued Java Man was an ancient human using fossils like Sangiran (left) and Peking Man (right)

Dubois argued that "P. erectus" was a gibbon-like ape which was the precursor to a more familiar human body plan, but in the 1930s, German-American anatomist Franz Weidenreich noticed a striking similarity with ancient human remains recently being unearthed in China (Peking Man, "Sinanthropus pekinensis").[8][9] This characterization became better supported as German-Dutch palaeontologist Gustav Heinrich Ralph von Koenigswald discovered more Indonesian ancient human remains over the decade at Mojokerto, Sangiran, and Ngandong.[note 4][11][12] Weidenreich believed that they were the direct ancestors of the local modern human Homo sapiens subspecies, in accord with historical race concepts (polycentricism) — that is, Peking Man was the direct ancestor of specifically Chinese people, and Java Man of Aboriginal Australians.[13][14] As the significance of racial distinction diminished with the development of modern evolutionary synthesis, many fossil human species and genera around Asia, Africa, and Europe (including "Pithecanthropus" and "Sinanthropus") were reclassified as subspecies of Homo erectus.[15][16]

During the late 20th century, some of the oldest H. erectus fossils were discovered across Africa, the first being Kenyan archeologist Louis Leakey's Olduvai Hominin 9 in 1960.[17] As the human fossil record expanded, the "Out of Africa" theory and monogenism became the consensus: that all modern humans share a fully anatomically modern common ancestor. H. erectus is now generally considered to be an African species which later dispersed across Eurasia, with later African populations giving rise to the modern human lineage.[18]

Subspecies

[edit]

By the middle of the 20th century, human taxonomy was in turmoil, with many poorly-defined species and genera described across Europe, Asia, and Africa; which exaggerated the differences among them.[19] In 1940, Weidenreich was the first to suggest reclassifying "Sinanthropus pekinensis" and "Pithecanthropus erectus" as subspecies of H. erectus.[13] In 1950, German-American evolutionary biologist Ernst Mayr entered this field. Surveying a "bewildering diversity of names" and many proposals for consolidation, he decided to reclassify human fossils into three species of Homo: "H. transvaalensis" (the australopithecines), H. erectus (including "Sinanthropus", "Pithecanthropus", and various other Asian, African, and European taxa), and H. sapiens (including anything younger than H. erectus, such as modern humans and Neanderthals). Mayr defined these species as a sequential lineage, each evolving into the next (chronospecies).[14] Though later Mayr changed his opinion on the australopithecines (recognizing Australopithecus), his more conservative view of archaic human diversity became widely adopted in the subsequent decades.[15]

...never more than one species of man existed on the earth at any one time... If fossils of Congo pygmies and of Watusi were to be found in the same deposit by a paleontologist, a million years hence, he might well think that they belonged to two different species.

—?Ernst Mayr, 1950[14]

In the 1970s, as population genetics was being formulated, the anatomical variation of H. erectus across its wide geographic and temporal range (the basis for the subspecies distinctions) became better understood as clines — different populations which attained some anatomical regionality but were not reproductively isolated.[18] In general, subspecies names for H. erectus are now used for convenience to indicate time and region rather than specific anatomical trends.[20]

...to paleontologists in general, subspecies are epiphenomena which do not merit the attention paid to species... The pursuit of subspecies in the fossil record is at best fraught with difficulty, and is more probably futile.

Reconstructions of H. e. ergaster (KNM ER 3733) left and H. e. pekinensis right

The more commonly used subspecies (if any are used) are:[22]

The ancient Georgia fossils have variably been classified as H. e. ergaster (or quadrinomial H. e. ergaster georgicus),[25] as its own subspecies as H. e. georgicus, or as its own species H. georgicus.[23] Some authors may also elevate H. ergaster,[26] H. soloensis,[27] and H. pekinensis as species.[28] Fossils relegated to H. e. tautavelensis are traditionally assigned to H. heidelbergensis.[24]

Evolution and dispersal

[edit]
H. e. georgicus (above) represents one of the earliest dispersals out of Africa about 1.8 million years ago.[29]

H. erectus evolved in Africa from a population of H. habilis[30][31] and they coexisted for about half a million years.[32] The oldest identified H. erectus specimen is a 2.04 million year old skull, DNH 143, from Drimolen, South Africa, coexisting with the australopithecine Paranthropus robustus.[33] H. erectus dispersed out of Africa soon after evolution, the earliest recorded instances being H. e. georgicus 1.78 to 1.85 million years ago in Georgia[29] and the Indonesian Mojokerto and Sangiran sites 1.6 to 1.8 million years ago.[34][35] Populations may have pushed into northwestern Europe at around the same time.[36] While H. erectus is usually considered the first hominin to leave Africa, 2.48 and 2.1 million year old stone tools from respectively Zarqa Valley, Jordan, and Shangchen, China, could indicate earlier species left as well.[37] Since H. erectus was first defined in East Asia, those populations are sometimes distinguished as H. erectus sensu stricto ("in the strict sense"), and African and West Eurasian populations as H. erectus sensu lato ("in the broad sense"), but this may not reflect how these populations are actually related to each other.[note 5][20][31]

Once established around the Old World, H. erectus evolved into other later species in the genus Homo, including: H. heidelbergensis, H. antecessor,[38] H. floresiensis,[39] and H. luzonensis.[40] H. heidelbergensis, in turn, is usually placed as the last common ancestor of modern humans (H. sapiens), Neanderthals (H. neanderthalensis), and Denisovans.[38] H. erectus is thus a non-natural, paraphyletic grouping of fossils and does not include all the descendants of a last common ancestor.[41] Despite being designated as a different species, H. erectus may have interbred with some of its descendant species, namely the common ancestor of Neanderthals and Denisovans ("Neandersovans").[42]

Successive dispersals of   Homo erectus (yellow),   Homo neanderthalensis (ochre) and   Homo sapiens (red, Out of Africa II)

The dispersal of H. erectus is generally ascribed to the evolution of obligate bipedalism, better technology, and adoption of a carnivorous diet.[43] However, the sudden adoption of carnivory could be sampling bias, with earlier species consuming the same amount of meat.[44] Populations spread out via open grassland and woodland savannas, which were expanding due to a global aridification trend at the onset of the Quaternary glaciation.[43] H. erectus is usually thought to have occupied the Sahara and West Asia during humid periods, but populations may have persisted into desert periods.[45]

Most H. erectus sensu lato specimens date to 1 to 1.8 million years ago in the Early Pleistocene before giving way to descendant species.[1] The classification of Middle Pleistocene Homo has been a controversial topic, termed "the muddle in the middle".[24][46] H. erectus sensu stricto persisted much longer than sensu lato, with the youngest population (H. e. soloensis) dating to 108,000 to 117,000 years ago in Late Pleistocene Java.[1] This population appears to have died out when the savannah corridors closed and tropical jungle took over.[47]

A 2021 phylogeny of some H. erectus fossils using tip dating:[41]

Homo (2.85 million years ago)

H. habilis

H. erectus

Stw 53 (1.9 million years ago)

Dmanisi (1.8 million years ago)

Turkana (1.7 million years ago)

Olduvai Hominid 9 (1.5 million years ago)

Sangiran (1.4 million years ago)

Nanjing Man (0.6 million years ago)

Peking Man (0.5 million years ago)

Hexian (0.5 million years ago)

Sambungmacan (0.2 million years ago)

Ngandong (0.1 million years ago)

Biology

[edit]

As such a widely distributed species both across regions and through time, the anatomy of H erectus can vary considerably. Among living primates, the degree of regionality achieved by H. erectus (phenotypic plasticity) is only observed in modern humans.[48]

[edit]
Franz Weidenreich's reconstruction of the H. e. soloensis skull

Dubois originally described the species using a skullcap, noting the traits of a low and thickened cranial vault and a continuous bar of bone forming the brow ridge (supraorbital torus).[49] H. erectus fossils typically share these traits, but the Kenyan Koobi Fora skulls notably have thinner skulls and weaker supraorbital tori.[50] He also used several other traits now considered more typical of H. erectus sensu stricto, such as a sagittal keel running across the midline of the skullcap, a bar of bone across the back of the skull (occipital torus), and a strong crest on the mastoid part of the temporal bone.[49] These traits can be still be found, nonetheless, in a few H. erectus sensu lato specimens, namely the 1.47 million year old Olduvai Hominin 9.[51]

Compared to H. erectus sensu lato, the skullcap of sensu stricto narrows considerably at the front, the face is bigger and presumably more prognathic (it juts out more, but the face is poorly documented), and the molars are larger particularly in Indonesian fossils.[52] H. erectus was the first human species with a fleshy nose, which is generally thought to have evolved in response to breathing dry air in order to retain moisture.[53] Compared to earlier Homo, H. erectus has smaller teeth, thinner enamel, and weaker mandibles (jawbone), likely due to a greater reliance on tool use and food processing.[54]

The brain size of H. erectus varies considerably, but is generally smaller in H. erectus sensu lato, as low as 546 cc (33.3 cu in) in Dmanisi skull 5.[55] East Asian H. erectus overall are rather big-brained, averaging roughly 1,000 cc,[48] staying within the range of variation for modern humans.[56] The late-surviving H. e. soloensis has the biggest brain volume with one specimen measuring 1,251 cc (76.3 cu in).[51]

Body

[edit]
Turkana Boy at the Neanderthal Museum

The rest of the body is primarily understood by three partial skeletons from the Kenyan Lake Turkana site, notably Turkana Boy. Other postcranial fossils (all bones aside from the skull) attributed to H. erectus are not associated with a skull, making attribution unverifiable. Though the body plan of earlier Homo is poorly understood, H. erectus is usually characterized as the first Homo species with a human body plan, distinct from non-human apes.[57][48][58] The chest may have been short and barrel-shaped, like other archaic humans.[59] Fossil tracks near Ileret, Kenya, suggest a human gait. This adaptation is implicated in the dispersal of H. erectus across the Old World.[60]

It is unclear when human ancestors lost most of their body hair. Genetic analysis suggests that high activity in the melanocortin 1 receptor, which produces dark skin, dates back to 1.2 million years ago. This could indicate the evolution of hairlessness around this time, as a lack of body hair would have left the skin exposed to harmful UV radiation.[61] It is possible that populations in higher latitudes developed lighter skin to prevent vitamin D deficiency,[62] though a 300,000 to 500,000 year old Turkish H. erectus specimen presents the earliest case of tuberculous meningitis, which is typically exacerbated by vitamin D deficiency in dark-skinned people living in higher latitudes.[63] Hairlessness is generally thought to have facilitated sweating,[64] but it may also have helped to reduce parasite load, and was possibly reinforced by sexual selection.[65][66]

Size

[edit]

Height reconstructions range approximately 148–167 cm (4 ft 10 in – 5 ft 6 in), with tropical populations typically reconstructed as scoring on the higher end like modern human populations. Adult weight is harder to approximate, but about 50 kg (110 lb) may have been normal. H. erectus is usually thought to be the first human species with little size-specific sexual dimorphism, but the variability of postcranial material makes this unclear.[48]

The Turkana Boy specimen was originally estimated in 1993 to have been roughly 165 cm (5 ft) when it died at about 12 years of age, and predicted to reach 177–193 cm (5 ft 10 in – 6 ft 4 in) had it survived past its pubertal growth spurt and into adulthood — assuming a humanlike growth curve. Further fossil discoveries instead better support an apelike growth curve, making for an adult height of 163 cm (5 ft 4 in) at the age of 16.[67]

Growth and development

[edit]

The dimensions of a 1.8 million years old adult female H. e. ergaster pelvis from Gona, Ethiopia, suggests that she would have been capable of birthing children with a maximum prenatal brain size of 315 cc (19.2 cu in), about 30–50% of adult brain size, falling between chimpanzees (~40%) and modern humans (28%).[68] Similarly, a 1.5 million year old infant skull from Mojokerto had a brain volume of about 72–84% the size of an adult, which suggests a brain growth trajectory more similar to that of non-human apes.[69] This suggests that the childhood growth and development of H. erectus was intermediate between that of chimpanzees and modern humans,[68] and the faster development rate suggests that altriciality (an extended childhood) evolved at a later stage in human evolution.[69] The faster development rate might also indicate a shorter expected lifespan compared to later Homo.[70]

Bone thickness

[edit]
Cross sections of Peking Man Skulls III (A) and XII (B), and Java Man Skull II (C)

The bones are extraordinarily thickened, particularly in Homo erectus sensu stricto, so much so that skull fragments have sometimes been confused for fossil turtle carapaces.[71] The medullary canal in the long bones (where the bone marrow is stored, in the limbs) is extremely narrowed (medullary stenosis). This degree of thickening is usually exhibited in semi-aquatic animals which use their heavy (pachyosteosclerotic) bones as ballasts to help them sink, induced by hypothyroidism.[72]

It is unclear what function intense bone thickening could have served. Before more complete skeletons were discovered, Weidenreich suggested H. erectus was a gigantic species.[73] Other explanations include a far more violent and impact-prone lifestyle than other Homo, or pathological nutrient deficiencies.[74] The supraorbital torus thickens with age, and may be a response to bending stresses from habitual loading of the front teeth.[75]

Culture

[edit]

Subsistence

[edit]
H. erectus overhunting may have led to the extinction of Megalochelys (above).[76]

H. erectus was early-on portrayed as the earliest hunter-gatherer and a skilled predator of big game, relying on running. The few identified specimens of the H. e. ergaster torso and pelvis may indicate a body plan more conducive for power running, unlike modern humans better adapted for endurance running.[59] The gradual shift to "top predator" may have led to its dispersal throughout Afro-Eurasia.[43] Though scavenging may have instead played a bigger role at least in some populations, H. erectus fossils are often associated with the butchered remains of large herbivores,[77] especially elephants, rhinos, hippos, bovines, and boars. The complexities of prey behaviors and the nutritional value of meat have been connected to brain volume growth.[78]

H. erectus is usually assumed to have practiced sexual division of labor much like recent hunter-gatherer societies, with men hunting and women gathering. This ideation is supported by a fossil trackway from Ileret, Kenya, made by a probably all-male band of over 20 H. erectus individuals, possibly a hunting party or (similar to chimpanzees) a border patrol group.[79]

Since common modern human tapeworms began to diverge from those of other predators roughly 1.7 million years ago (specifically the pork tapeworm, beef tapeworm, and Asian tapeworm), not only was H. erectus consuming meat regularly enough for speciation to occur in these parasites, but meat was probably consumed raw more often than not.[80] Some populations were collecting aquatic resources, include fish, shellfish, and turtles such as at Lake Turkana[81] and Trinil.[82] Underground storage organs (roots, tubers, etc.) were likely also major dietary components, and traces of the edible plant Celtis have been documented at several H. erectus sites.[83]

Possibly due to overhunting of the biggest game available, the dispersal of H. erectus and descendant species may be implicated in the extinctions of large herbivores and the gradual reduction of average herbivore size over the Pleistocene.[84] H. erectus overhunting has been blamed by some authors for the decline of proboscidean species as well as competing carnivores,[78][85][86] but their decline may be better attributed to the spread of grasslands.[86][87] The giant tortoise Megalochelys may have been driven to extinction by H. erectus in Sundaland (what is now Island Southeast Asia), since species went extinct shortly after the arrival of H. erectus.[76]

Technology

[edit]

Stone tools

[edit]
A handaxe from the Saint-Acheul site at the Musée d'Archéologie nationale, France

H. erectus manufactured Lower Paleolithic technologies, and is credited with the invention of the Acheulean stone tool industry at latest 1.95 million years ago.[88] This was a major technological breakthrough featuring large, heavy-duty tools; most iconically, the handaxe. Over hundreds of thousands of years, the Achuelean eventually replaced its predecessor — the Oldowan (a chopper and flake industry) — in Africa, and spread out across Western Eurasia.[89] This sudden innovation was typically explained as a response to environmental instability in order to process more types of food and broaden the diet, which allowed H. erectus to colonize Eurasia. Despite this characterization of the Acheulean, H. e. georgicus was able to leave Africa despite only manufacturing Oldowan-style tools,[43][89] and the handaxe does not seem to have been manufactured commonly in East Asia.[90] This conspicuous pattern was first noted by American archaeologist Hallam L. Movius in 1948, who drew the "Movius Line", dividing the East into a "chopping-tool culture" and the West into a "hand axe culture".[91] Movius took this as evidence of inferiority of Far Eastern populations:

...as early as Lower Palaeolithic times Southern and Eastern Asia as a whole was a region of cultural retardation...very primitive forms of Early Man apparently persisted there long after types at a comparable stage of physical evolution had become extinct elsewhere.

Reconstruction of Turkana Boy at the Neanderthal Museum

H. erectus seems to have been using stone tools in butchery, vegetable processing, and woodworking (maybe manufacturing spears and digging sticks).[83][92] In Africa, Oldowan sites are typically found alongside major fossil assemblages, but Acheulean sites normally feature more stone tools than fossils, so H. erectus could have been using choppers and handaxes for different activities.[92]

Materials for stone tools were normally sourced locally, and it seems blanks were usually chosen based on size rather than material quality.[89] H. erectus also produced tools from shells at Sangiran[93] and Trinil.[94]

Fire

[edit]

H. erectus is credited as the first human species to wield fire. The earliest claimed fire site is Wonderwerk Cave, South Africa, at 1.7 million years old.[95] While the species' dispersal far out of Africa has often been attributed to fire and cave dwelling, fire does not become common in the archaeological record until 300,000 to 400,000 years ago,[96] and cave-dwelling about 600,000 years ago.[97] Therefore, H. erectus may have only been scavenging fire opportunistically. Similarly, H. erectus sites usually stay within warmer tropical or subtropical latitudes.[43]

The dating of northerly populations (namely Peking Man) could suggest that they were retreating to warmer refugia during glacial periods, but the precise age of the Peking Man fossils is poorly resolved.[49][98] There have been claims of manmade hearths and "clear-cut evidence for intentional fire use",[99] ostensibly as far back as 770,000 years ago in the supposed cave home of Peking Man.[98] At the French Caune de L'Arago, Tautavel Man does not seem to have been using fire at all, even though occupation sequences span two cold periods.[24]

Healthcare

[edit]
The single-toothed H. e. georgicus specimen (above) is the earliest probable example of group care.[100]

Like other primates, H. erectus probably used medicinal plants[83] and infirmed sick group members. The earliest probable example of this is a 1.77 million year old H. e. georgicus specimen who had lost all but one tooth due to age or gum disease (the earliest example of severe chewing impairment) yet still survived for several years afterwards.[100]

Seafaring

[edit]

H. erectus made long sea crossings to arrive on the islands of Flores, Luzon,[101] and some Mediterranean islands. Some authors have asserted that H. erectus intentionally made these crossings by inventing watercrafts and seafaring so early in time, speaking to advanced cognition and language skills. These populations could have also been founded by natural rafting events instead.[102]

Art and rituals

[edit]

In East Asia, H. erectus is usually represented only by skullcaps, which used to be interpreted as widespread cannibalism and ritual headhunting. This had been reinforced by the historic practice of headhunting and cannibalism in some recent Indonesian, Australian, and Polynesian cultures, which were formerly believed to have directly descended from these H. erectus populations. The lack of the rest of the skeleton is now normally explained by natural phenomena.[103]

Engraved Pseudodon shell DUB1006-fL from Trinil, Java

Art-making could be evidence of symbolic thinking. An engraved Pseudodon shell DUB1006-fL from Trinil, Java, with geometric markings could possibly be the earliest example of art-making, dating to 436,000 to 546,000 years ago.[94][104][105] H. erectus was also the earliest human to collect red-colored pigments, namely ochre. Ochre lumps at Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania, associated with the 1.4 million year old Olduvai Hominid 9 may have been purposefully shaped and trimmed by a hammerstone. Red ochre is normally recognized as bearing symbolic value when associated with modern humans.[105]

Language

[edit]

The spinal column of the 1.6 million year old Turkana boy would not have supported properly developed respiratory muscles required to produce speech;[106][107] and a 1.5 million year old infant H. erectus skull from Mojokerto, Java, shows that this population did not have an extended childhood, which is a prerequisite for language acquisition.[69] On the other hand, despite the cochlear (ear) anatomy of Sangiran 2 and 4 retaining several traits reminiscent of australopithecines, the hearing range may have included the higher frequencies used to discern speech.[108]

Given expanding brain size and technological innovation, H. erectus may have been using some basic proto-language in combination with gesturing, and built the basic framework around which fully-fledged languages would eventually be formed.[109]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^ The Java Man femur presents a noticeable osteocyte, likely Paget's disease of bone and osteopetrosis (thickening of the bone), probably stemming from skeletal fluorosis caused by ingestion of food contaminated by fluoride-filled volcanic ash (as the specimen was found in ash-filled strata). Livestock that graze on volcanic ash-ridden fields typically die of acute toxicity within a few days or weeks.[2]
  2. ^ Darwin's work mainly aimed to demonstrate that his theory of common descent with modification by natural and sexual selection applied to humans, "The sole object of this work is to consider, firstly, whether man, like every other species, is descended from some pre-existing form; secondly, the manner of his development; and thirdly, the value of the differences between the so-called races of man."[5]
  3. ^ Dubois was studying the anatomy and evolution of the larynx in vertebrates in Amsterdam with German anatomist Max Fürbringer, but fed up with both the research and Fürbringer, he decided to drop everything and board the SS Prinses Amalia to the Dutch East Indies on 29 October 1887. Dubois said his interest in human evolution began in secondary school (the State Hogere Burgerschool), where he heard of lectures given by Carl Vogt in 1868.[6]
  4. ^ Dubois never accepted that the Java Man was a type of human, and continued to fight Weidenreich and von Koenigswald until his death in 1940. Sir Arthur Keith described Dubois in an obituary notice as, "an idealist, his ideas being so firmly held that his mind tended to bend facts rather than alter his ideas to fit them."[10]
  5. ^ There may have been two different H. erectus dispersals into East Asia: an early one that led to the Sangiran Java Man (specifically the older material), and a later one which led to the northern Chinese Peking Man. That is, the older Sangiran material may be more closely related to H. erectus sensu lato than to Peking Man. The younger Sangiran material, though, possibly descended from or interbred with Chinese H. erectus.[31]
  6. ^ H. heidelbergensis is also a paraphyletic assemblage of fossils.[41]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b c Rizal, Y.; Westaway, K. E.; Zaim, Y.; van den Bergh; Bettis III, E. A.; Morwood, M. J.; Huffman, O. F.; Grün, R.; Joannes-Boyau, R.; Bailey, R. M.; Sidarto; Westaway, M. C.; Kurniawan, I.; Moore, M. W.; Storey, M.; Aziz, F.; Suminto; Zhao, J.; Aswan; Sipola, M. E.; Larick, R.; Zonneveld, J.-P.; Scott, R.; Putt, S.; Ciochon, R. L. (2020). "Last appearance of Homo erectus at Ngandong, Java, 117,000–108,000 years ago". Nature. 577 (7790): 381–385. doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1863-2. hdl:10072/397335. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 31853068. S2CID 209410644.
  2. ^ Soriano, M. (1970). "The fluoric origin of the bone lesion in the Pithecanthropus erectus femur". American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 32 (1): 49–57. doi:10.1002/ajpa.1330320107. PMID 4984453.
  3. ^ a b c Hsiao-Pei, Y. (2014). "Evolutionary Asiacentrism, Peking Man, and the Origins of Sinocentric Ethno-Nationalism". Journal of the History of Biology. 47 (4): 585–625. doi:10.1007/s10739-014-9381-4. PMID 24771020. S2CID 23308894.
  4. ^ Haeckel, E. (1876) [1868]. Natürliche Sch?pfungsgeschichte [The history of creation]. Translated by Lankester, E. R. Henry S. King & Co. p. 361.
  5. ^ Darwin, C. (1871). The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. John Murray. p. 3.
  6. ^ Theunissen 1989, pp. 27–30.
  7. ^ Theunissen 1989, 54–59.
  8. ^ Theunissen 1989, p. 156.
  9. ^ Boaz & Ciochon 2004, pp. 59–60.
  10. ^ Theunissen 1989, pp. 159–165.
  11. ^ Boaz & Ciochon 2004, pp. 60–62.
  12. ^ von Koenigswald, G. H. R.; Weidenreich, F. (1939). "The Relationship between Pithecanthropus and Sinanthropus". Nature. 144 (3657): 926–929. Bibcode:1939Natur.144..926V. doi:10.1038/144926a0.
  13. ^ a b Weidenreich, F. (1940). "Some problems dealing with ancient man". American Anthropologist. 42 (3): 375–383. doi:10.1525/aa.1940.42.3.02a00010.
  14. ^ a b c Mayr, E. (1950). "Taxonomic categories in fossil hominids". Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology. 15: 109–118. doi:10.1101/SQB.1950.015.01.013. PMID 14942702.
  15. ^ a b Schwartz, J. H.; Tattersall, I. (2010). "Fossil evidence for the origin of Homo sapiens". American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 143 (S51): 96–98, 101–103. doi:10.1002/ajpa.21443. PMID 21086529.
  16. ^ Boaz & Ciochon 2004, pp. 70–73.
  17. ^ Boaz & Ciochon 2004, pp. 68–72.
  18. ^ a b Boaz & Ciochon 2004, pp. 151–153.
  19. ^ Boaz & Ciochon 2004, p. 65.
  20. ^ a b Antón, S. C. (2002). "Evolutionary significance of cranial variation in Asian Homo erectus". American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 118 (4): 302. doi:10.1002/ajpa.10091. PMID 12124912.
  21. ^ Tattersall, I. (1986). "Species recognition in human paleontology". Journal of Human Evolution. 15 (3): 168. Bibcode:1986JHumE..15..165T. doi:10.1016/S0047-2484(86)80043-4.
  22. ^ Antón 2003, p. 153.
  23. ^ a b Rightmire, G. Philip; Lordkipanidze, David; Vekua, Abesalom (2006). "Anatomical descriptions, comparative studies and evolutionary significance of the hominin skulls from Dmanisi, Republic of Georgia". Journal of Human Evolution. 50 (2): 140. Bibcode:2006JHumE..50..115R. doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2005.07.009. PMID 16271745.
  24. ^ a b c d de Lumley, M.-A. (2015). "L'homme de Tautavel. Un Homo erectus européen évolué. Homo erectus tautavelensis" [Tautavel Man. An evolved European Homo erectus. Homo erectus tautavelensis]. L'Anthropologie (in French). 119 (3): 342–344. doi:10.1016/j.anthro.2015.06.001.
  25. ^ Zollikofer, C. P. E.; Ponce de León, M. S.; Margvelashvili, A.; Rightmire, G. Philip; Lordkipanidze, D. (2014). "Response to Comment on "A Complete Skull from Dmanisi, Georgia, and the Evolutionary Biology of Early Homo"". Science. 344 (6182): 360–b. Bibcode:2014Sci...344..360Z. doi:10.1126/science.1250081. PMID 24763573. S2CID 206554612.
  26. ^ Rightmire, G. Philip; Ponce de León, Marcia S.; Lordkipanidze, David; Margvelashvili, Ann; Zollikofer, Christoph P. E. (2017). "Skull 5 from Dmanisi: Descriptive anatomy, comparative studies, and evolutionary significance". Journal of Human Evolution. 104: 51. Bibcode:2017JHumE.104...50R. doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2017.01.005. PMID 28317556.
  27. ^ Zeitoun, V.; Détroit, F.; Grimaud-Hervé, D.; Widianto, H. (2010). "Solo man in question: Convergent views to split Indonesian Homo erectus in two categories" (PDF). Quaternary International. 223–224: 288. Bibcode:2010QuInt.223..281Z. doi:10.1016/j.quaint.2010.01.018. S2CID 84764668. Archived (PDF) from the original on 29 April 2021. Retrieved 22 May 2021.
  28. ^ Marwick, B. (2009). "Biogeography of Middle Pleistocene hominins in mainland Southeast Asia: A review of current evidence". Quaternary International. 202 (1–2): 53. Bibcode:2009QuInt.202...51M. doi:10.1016/j.quaint.2008.01.012.
  29. ^ a b Ferring, Reid; Oms, Oriel; Agustí, Jordi; Berna, Francesco; Nioradze, Medea; Shelia, Teona; Tappen, Martha; Vekua, Abesalom; Zhvania, David; Lordkipanidze, David (2011). "Earliest human occupations at Dmanisi (Georgian Caucasus) dated to 1.85–1.78 Ma". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 108 (26): 10432–6. doi:10.1073/pnas.1106638108. PMC 3127884. PMID 21646521.
  30. ^ Boaz & Ciochon 2004, pp. 143–144.
  31. ^ a b c Zaim, Y.; Ciochon, R. L.; Polanski, J. M.; Grine, F. E.; Bettis, E. A.; Rizal, Y.; Franciscus, R. G.; Larick, R. R.; Heizler, M.; Eaves, K. L.; Marsh, H. E. (2011). "New 1.5 million-year-old Homo erectus maxilla from Sangiran (Central Java, Indonesia)". Journal of Human Evolution. 61 (4): 363–376. Bibcode:2011JHumE..61..363Z. doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2011.04.009. PMID 21783226.
  32. ^ Spoor, F.; Leakey, M. G.; Gathogo, P. N.; Brown, F. H.; Antón, S. C.; McDougall, I.; Kiarie, C.; Manthi, F. K.; Leakey, L. N. (2007). "Implications of new early Homo fossils from Ileret, east of Lake Turkana, Kenya". Nature. 448 (7154): 689. doi:10.1038/nature05986. ISSN 0028-0836.
  33. ^ Herries, Andy I. R.; Martin, Jesse M. (2020). "Contemporaneity of Australopithecus, Paranthropus, and early Homo erectus in South Africa". Science. 368 (6486): eaaw7293. doi:10.1126/science.aaw7293. hdl:11568/1040368. PMID 32241925. S2CID 214763272.
  34. ^ Antón 2003, p. 142.
  35. ^ Boaz & Ciochon 2004, p. 162.
  36. ^ Reumer, J. W. F.; Peters, N.; de Vos, J. (2021). "Did Homo erectus sensu lato live in western Europe during the Early Pleistocene? An ecological approach to a vexing question". Cainozoic Research. 21 (1): 97–109.
  37. ^ Scardia, Giancarlo; Parenti, Fabio; Miggins, Daniel P.; Gerdes, Axel; Araujo, Astolfo G. M.; Neves, Walter A. (2019). "Chronologic constraints on hominin dispersal outside Africa since 2.48 Ma from the Zarqa Valley, Jordan". Quaternary Science Reviews. 219: 1–19. Bibcode:2019QSRv..219....1S. doi:10.1016/j.quascirev.2019.06.007. hdl:11449/187832. ISSN 0277-3791.
  38. ^ a b Stringer, C. (2012). "What makes a modern human". Nature. 485 (7396): 33–35. Bibcode:2012Natur.485...33S. doi:10.1038/485033a. PMID 22552077. S2CID 4420496.
  39. ^ Berger, L. R.; Churchill, S. E.; et al. (2008). "Small-Bodied Humans from Palau, Micronesia". PLOS ONE. 3 (3): e1780. Bibcode:2008PLoSO...3.1780B. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0001780. PMC 2268239. PMID 18347737.
  40. ^ Fleming, N. (2019). "Unknown human relative discovered in Philippine cave". Nature News. doi:10.1038/d41586-019-01152-3. PMID 32269371. S2CID 146786512.
  41. ^ a b c Ni, Xijun; Ji, Qiang; Wu, Wensheng; Shao, Qingfeng; Ji, Yannan; Zhang, Chi; Liang, Lei; Ge, Junyi; Guo, Zhen; Li, Jinhua; Li, Qiang; Grün, Rainer; Stringer, Chris (2021). "Massive cranium from Harbin in northeastern China establishes a new Middle Pleistocene human lineage". The Innovation. 2 (3): 100130. Bibcode:2021Innov...200130N. doi:10.1016/j.xinn.2021.100130. ISSN 2666-6758. PMC 8454562. PMID 34557770.
  42. ^ Waddell, P. J. (2013). "Happy New Year Homo erectus? More evidence for interbreeding with archaics predating the modern human/Neanderthal split". Quantitative Biology: 2–3. arXiv:1312.7749.
  43. ^ a b c d e Carotenuto, F.; Tsikaridze, N.; Rook, L.; Lordkipanidze, D.; Longo, L.; Condemi, S.; Raia, P. (2016). "Venturing out safely: The biogeography of Homo erectus dispersal out of Africa". Journal of Human Evolution. 95: 1–12. Bibcode:2016JHumE..95....1C. doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2016.02.005. hdl:10356/82274. PMID 27260171.
  44. ^ Barr, W. A.; Pobiner, B.; Rowan, J.; Faith, J. T. (2022). "No sustained increase in zooarchaeological evidence for carnivory after the appearance of Homo erectus". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 119 (5): e2115540119. Bibcode:2022PNAS..11915540B. doi:10.1073/pnas.2115540119. PMC 8812535. PMID 35074877.
  45. ^ Mercader, Julio; Akuku, Pamela; Boivin, Nicole; Camacho, Alfredo; Carter, Tristan; Clarke, Siobhán; Cueva Temprana, Arturo; Favreau, Julien; Galloway, Jennifer; Hernando, Raquel; Huang, Haiping; Hubbard, Stephen; Kaplan, Jed O.; Larter, Steve; Magohe, Stephen (2025). "Homo erectus adapted to steppe-desert climate extremes one million years ago". Communications Earth & Environment. 6 (1) 1. Bibcode:2025ComEE...6....1M. doi:10.1038/s43247-024-01919-1. ISSN 2662-4435. PMC 11738993. PMID 39830897.
  46. ^ Bae, C. J.; Wu, X. (2024). "Making sense of eastern Asian Late Quaternary hominin variability". Nature Communications. 15 (9479) 9479. Bibcode:2024NatCo..15.9479B. doi:10.1038/s41467-024-53918-7. PMC 11531466. PMID 39488555.
  47. ^ Louys, J.; Roberts, P. (2020). "Environmental drivers of megafauna and hominin extinction in Southeast Asia". Nature. 586 (7829): 402–406. Bibcode:2020Natur.586..402L. doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2810-y. hdl:10072/402368. PMID 33029012. S2CID 222217295.
  48. ^ a b c d Antón, S. C.; Taboada, H. G.; et al. (2016). "Morphological variation in Homo erectus and the origins of developmental plasticity". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B. 371 (1698): 20150236. doi:10.1098/rstb.2015.0236. PMC 4920293. PMID 27298467.
  49. ^ a b c Antón 2003, p. 132.
  50. ^ Antón 2003, p. 147.
  51. ^ a b Antón 2003, p. 136.
  52. ^ Antón 2003, pp. 146–147.
  53. ^ Franciscus, R. G.; Trinkaus, E. (1988). "Nasal morphology and the emergence of Homo erectus". American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 75 (4): 517–527. doi:10.1002/ajpa.1330750409. PMID 3133950.
  54. ^ Ungar, P. S.; Grine, F. E. (2006). "Diet in Early Homo: A Review of the Evidence and a New Model of Adaptive Versatility". Annual Review of Anthropology. 35: 208–228. doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.35.081705.123153.
  55. ^ Lordkipanidze, David; Ponce de León, Marcia S.; Margvelashvili, Ann; Rak, Yoel; Rightmire, G. Philip; Vekua, Abesalom; Zollikofer, Christoph P. E. (2013). "A Complete Skull from Dmanisi, Georgia, and the Evolutionary Biology of Early Homo". Science. 342 (6156): 326–331. Bibcode:2013Sci...342..326L. doi:10.1126/science.1238484. PMID 24136960. S2CID 20435482.
  56. ^ Clark, G.; Henneberg, M. (2022). "Interpopulational variation in human brain size: Implications for hominin cognitive phylogeny". Anthropological Review. 84 (4): 405–429. doi:10.2478/anre-2021-0029.
  57. ^ Antón 2003, pp. 147–152.
  58. ^ Haeusler, M.; Schiess, R.; Boeni, T. (2011). "New vertebral and rib material point to modern bauplan of the Nariokotome Homo erectus skeleton" (PDF). Journal of Human Evolution. 61 (5): 575–582. Bibcode:2011JHumE..61..575H. doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2011.07.004. PMID 21868059.
  59. ^ a b Bastir, M.; García-Martínez, D.; Torres-Tamayo, N.; Palancar, C. A.; Beyer, B.; Barash, A.; Villa, C.; Sanchis-Gimeno, J. A.; Riesco-López, A.; Nalla, S.; Torres-Sánchez, I.; García-Río, F.; Been, E.; Gómez-Olivencia, A.; Haeusler, M.; Williams, S. A.; Spoor, F. (2020). "Rib cage anatomy in Homo erectus suggests a recent evolutionary origin of modern human body shape". Nature Ecology & Evolution. 4 (9): 1178–1187. Bibcode:2020NatEE...4.1178B. doi:10.1038/s41559-020-1240-4. hdl:2013/ULB-DIPOT:oai:dipot.ulb.ac.be:2013/311388. PMID 32632258.
  60. ^ Hatala, K. G.; Roach, N. T.; Ostrofsky, K. R.; Wunderlich, R. E.; Dingwall, H. L.; Villmoare, B. A.; Green, D. J.; Harris, J. W.; Braun, D. R.; Richmond, B. G. (2016). "Footprints reveal direct evidence of group behavior and locomotion in Homo erectus". Scientific Reports. 6 (28766): 28766. Bibcode:2016NatSR...628766H. doi:10.1038/srep28766. PMC 4941528. PMID 27403790.
  61. ^ Rogers, A. R.; Iltis, D.; Wooding, S. (2004). "Genetic Variation at the MC1R Locus and the Time since Loss of Human Body Hair". Current Anthropology. 45 (1): 105–108. doi:10.1086/381006. S2CID 224795768.
  62. ^ Jablonski, N. G. (2012). "Human skin pigmentation as an example of adaptive evolution". Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society. 156 (1): 45–57. JSTOR 23558077. PMID 23035389.
  63. ^ Kappelman, J.; Al?i?ek, M. C.; Kazanci, N.; Schultz, M.; Ozkul, M.; Sen, S. (2008). "First Homo erectus from Turkey and implications for migrations into temperate Eurasia". American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 135 (1): 110–116. doi:10.1002/ajpa.20739. PMID 18067194.
  64. ^ Best, A.; Kamilar, J. M. (2018). "The evolution of eccrine sweat glands in human and nonhuman primates". Journal of Human Evolution. 117: 33–43. Bibcode:2018JHumE.117...33B. doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2017.12.003. PMID 29544622. S2CID 3921318.
  65. ^ Pagel, M; Bodmer, W. (2004). "The Evolution of Human Hairlessness: Cultural Adaptations and the Ectoparasite Hypothesis". Evolutionary Theory and Processes: Modern Horizons. Springer, Dordrecht. pp. 329–335. doi:10.1007/978-94-017-0443-4_17. ISBN 978-94-017-0443-4.
  66. ^ Gile, J. (2010). "Naked Love: The Evolution of Human Hairlessness". Biological Theory. 5 (4): 326–336. doi:10.1162/BIOT_a_00062. S2CID 84164968.
  67. ^ Graves, R. R.; Lupo, A. C.; McCarthy, R. C.; Wescott, D. J.; Cunningham, D. L. (2010). "Just how strapping was KNM-WT 15000?". Journal of Human Evolution. 59 (5): 542–554. Bibcode:2010JHumE..59..542G. doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2010.06.007. PMID 20846707.
  68. ^ a b Simpson, Scott W.; Quade, Jay; Levin, Naomi E.; Butler, Robert; Dupont-Nivet, Guillaume; Everett, Melanie; Semaw, Sileshi (2008). "A Female Homo erectus Pelvis from Gona, Ethiopia". Science. 322 (5904): 1089–1092. Bibcode:2008Sci...322.1089S. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.710.7337. doi:10.1126/science.1163592. PMID 19008443. S2CID 22191315.
  69. ^ a b c Coqueugniot, H.; Hublin, J.-J.; et al. (2004). "Early brain growth in Homo erectus and implications for cognitive ability". Nature. 431 (7006): 299–302. Bibcode:2004Natur.431..299C. doi:10.1038/nature02852. PMID 15372030. S2CID 4428043.
  70. ^ Caspari, Rachel; Lee, Sang-Hee (2004). "Older age becomes common late in human evolution". PNAS. 101 (30): 10, 895–10, 900. doi:10.1073/pnas.0402857101. PMC 503716. PMID 15252198.
  71. ^ Boaz & Ciochon 2004, p. 74.
  72. ^ Kennedy, G. E. (1985). "Bone thickness in Homo erectus". Journal of Human Evolution. 14 (8): 699–708. Bibcode:1985JHumE..14..699K. doi:10.1016/S0047-2484(85)80052-X.
  73. ^ Weidenreich, F. (1946). "Giants as Earliest Ancestors". Apes, Giants, and Man. University of Chicago Press.
  74. ^ Boaz & Ciochon 2004, pp. 80–86.
  75. ^ Russell, M. D.; Brown, T.; Garn, S. M.; Giris, F.; Turkel, S.; ??can, M. Y.; Oyen, O. J.; Jacobshagen, B.; Pietrusewsky, M.; Rightmire, G. P.; Smith, F. H. (1985). "The Supraorbital Torus: 'A Most Remarkable Peculiarity'". Current Anthropology. 26 (3): 337–350. doi:10.1086/203279. S2CID 146857927.
  76. ^ a b Rhodin, A.; Pritchard, P.; van Dijk, P. P.; Saumure, R.; Buhlmann, K.; Iverson, J.; Mittermeier, R., eds. (2015). "Turtles and Tortoises of the World During the Rise and Global Spread of Humanity: First Checklist and Review of Extinct Pleistocene and Holocene Chelonians". Conservation Biology of Freshwater Turtles and Tortoises. Chelonian Research Monographs. Vol. 5 (First ed.). Chelonian Research Foundation. p. 15. doi:10.3854/crm.5.000e.fossil.checklist.v1.2015. ISBN 978-0-9653540-9-7.
  77. ^ Boaz & Ciochon 2004, p. 105.
  78. ^ a b Ben-Dor, M.; Gopher, A.; Hershkovitz, I; Barkai, R. (2011). "Man the fat hunter: the demise of Homo erectus and the emergence of a new hominin lineage in the Middle Pleistocene (ca. 400 kyr) Levant". PLOS ONE. 6 (12): e28689. Bibcode:2011PLoSO...628689B. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0028689. PMC 3235142. PMID 22174868.
  79. ^ Hatala, Kevin G.; Roach, Neil T.; Ostrofsky, Kelly R.; Wunderlich, Roshna E.; Dingwall, Heather L.; Villmoare, Brian A.; Green, David J.; Harris, John W. K.; Braun, David R.; Richmond, Brian G. (2016). "Footprints reveal direct evidence of group behavior and locomotion in Homo erectus". Scientific Reports. 6 (28766): 28766. Bibcode:2016NatSR...628766H. doi:10.1038/srep28766. PMC 4941528. PMID 27403790.
  80. ^ Boaz & Ciochon 2004, p. 105–107.
  81. ^ Steele, T. E. (2010). "A unique hominin menu dated to 1.95 million years ago". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 107 (24): 10771–10772. Bibcode:2010PNAS..10710771S. doi:10.1073/pnas.1005992107. PMC 2890732. PMID 20534542.
  82. ^ Joordens, J. C.; Wesselingh, F. P.; de Vos, J.; Vonhof, H. B.; Kroon, D. (2009). "Relevance of aquatic environments for hominins: a case study from Trinil (Java, Indonesia)". Journal of Human Evolution. 57 (6): 656–671. Bibcode:2009JHumE..57..656J. doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2009.06.003. PMID 19683789.
  83. ^ a b c Hardy, K. (2018). "Plant use in the Lower and Middle Palaeolithic: Food, medicine and raw materials". Quaternary Science Reviews. 191: 393–398. Bibcode:2018QSRv..191..393H. doi:10.1016/j.quascirev.2018.04.028.
  84. ^ Dembitzer, J.; Barkai, R.; Ben-Dor, M.; Meiri, S. (2022). "Levantine overkill: 1.5 million years of hunting down the body size distribution". Quaternary Science Reviews. 276 107316. Bibcode:2022QSRv..27607316D. doi:10.1016/j.quascirev.2021.107316.
  85. ^ Surovell, T.; Waguespack, N.; Brantingham, P. J. (2005). "Global archaeological evidence for proboscidean overkill". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 102 (17): 6, 231–6, 236. Bibcode:2005PNAS..102.6231S. doi:10.1073/pnas.0501947102. PMC 1087946. PMID 15829581.
  86. ^ a b Faith, J. Tyler; Rowan, John; Du, Andrew; Barr, W. Andrew (2020). "The uncertain case for human-driven extinctions prior to Homo sapiens". Quaternary Research. 96: 88–104. doi:10.1017/qua.2020.51.
  87. ^ Saarinen, Juha; Lister, Adrian M. (2023). "Fluctuating climate and dietary innovation drove ratcheted evolution of proboscidean dental traits". Nature Ecology & Evolution. 7 (9): 1490–1502. Bibcode:2023NatEE...7.1490S. doi:10.1038/s41559-023-02151-4. PMC 10482678. PMID 37580434.
  88. ^ Mussi, Margherita; Skinner, Matthew M.; Melis, Rita T.; Panera, Joaquín; Rubio-Jara, Susana; Davies, Thomas W.; Geraads, Denis; Bocherens, Hervé; Briatico, Giuseppe; Le Cabec, Adeline; Hublin, Jean-Jacques; Gidna, Agness; Bonnefille, Raymonde; Di Bianco, Luca; Méndez-Quintas, Eduardo (2023). "Early Homo erectus lived at high altitudes and produced both Oldowan and Acheulean tools". Science. 382 (6671): 713–718. Bibcode:2023Sci...382..713M. doi:10.1126/science.add9115. PMID 37824630.
  89. ^ a b c de la Torre, I. (2016). "The origins of the Acheulean: past and present perspectives on a major transition in human evolution". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences. 371 (1698): 20150245. doi:10.1098/rstb.2015.0245. PMC 4920301. PMID 27298475.
  90. ^ Li, H.; Li, C.; Kuman, K. (2014). "Rethinking the "Acheulean" in East Asia: Evidence from recent investigations in the Danjiangkou Reservoir Region, central China". Quaternary International. 347: 163–175. Bibcode:2014QuInt.347..163L. doi:10.1016/j.quaint.2014.03.059.
  91. ^ a b Movius, H. L. (1948). "The Lower Palaeolithic Cultures of Southern and Eastern Asia". Transactions of the American Philosophical Society. 38 (4): 386–403. doi:10.2307/1005632. JSTOR 1005632.
  92. ^ a b Dominguez-Rodrigo, M.; Serrallonga, J.; Juan-Tresserras, J.; Alcala, L.; Luque, L. (2001). "Woodworking activities by early humans: a plant residue analysis on Acheulian stone tools from Peninj (Tanzania)". Journal of Human Evolution. 40 (4): 289–299. Bibcode:2001JHumE..40..289D. doi:10.1006/jhev.2000.0466. PMID 11312582.
  93. ^ Choi, K.; Driwantoro, D. (2007). "Shell tool use by early members of Homo erectus in Sangiran, central Java, Indonesia: cut mark evidence". Journal of Archaeological Science. 34 (1): 48–58. Bibcode:2007JArSc..34...48C. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2006.03.013.
  94. ^ a b Joordens, J. C.; d'Errico, F.; Wesselingh, F. P.; Munro, S.; de Vos, J; Wallinga, J.; Ankj?rgaard, C.; Reimann, T.; Wijbrans, J. R.; Kuiper, K. F.; Mücher, H. J.; Coqueugniot, H.; Prié, V; Joosten, I.; van Os, B.; Schulp, A. S.; Panuel, M.; van der Haas, V.; Lustenhouwer, W.; Reijmer, J. J.; Roebroeks, W. (2015). "Homo erectus at Trinil on Java used shells for tool production and engraving". Nature. 518 (7538): 228–231. Bibcode:2015Natur.518..228J. doi:10.1038/nature13962. PMID 25470048. S2CID 4461751.
  95. ^ Beaumont, P. B. (2011). "The Edge: More on Fire-Making by about 1.7 Million Years Ago at Wonderwerk Cave in South Africa". Current Anthropology. 52 (4): 585–595. doi:10.1086/660919. S2CID 144176681.
  96. ^ Roebroeks, W.; Villa, P. (2011). "On the earliest evidence for habitual use of fire in Europe". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 108 (13): 5209–5214. Bibcode:2011PNAS..108.5209R. doi:10.1073/pnas.1018116108. PMC 3069174. PMID 21402905.
  97. ^ Ullman, M.; Hovers, E.; Goren-Inbar, N.; Frumkin, A. (2013). "Levantine cave dwellers: geographic and environmental aspects of early humans use of caves, case study from Wadi Amud, northern Israel". International Congress of Speleology. 1: 169.
  98. ^ a b Zhong, M.; Shi, C.; et al. (2013). "On the possible use of fire by Homo erectus at Zhoukoudian, China". Chinese Science Bulletin. 59 (3): 335–343. doi:10.1007/s11434-013-0061-0. S2CID 93590269.
  99. ^ Gao, X.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, F. (2017). "Evidence of Hominin Use and Maintenance of Fire at Zhoukoudian". Current Anthropology. 58 (S16): S267 – S277. doi:10.1086/692501. S2CID 164616520.
  100. ^ a b Spikins, P.; Needham, A.; Wright, B; Dytham, C; Gatta, M.; Hitchens, G. (2019). "Living to fight another day: The ecological and evolutionary significance of Neanderthal healthcare". Quaternary Science Reviews. 217: 98–118. Bibcode:2019QSRv..217...98S. doi:10.1016/j.quascirev.2018.08.011.
  101. ^ Détroit, F.; Mijares, A. S.; Corny, J.; Daver, G.; Zanolli, C.; Dizon, E.; Robles, E.; Grün, R. & Piper, P. J. (2019). "A new species of Homo from the Late Pleistocene of the Philippines" (PDF). Nature. 568 (7751): 181–186. Bibcode:2019Natur.568..181D. doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1067-9. hdl:10072/386785. PMID 30971845. S2CID 106411053.
  102. ^ Botha, Rudolf (2024). "Did Homo erectus Have Language? The Seafaring Inference". Cambridge Archaeological Journal. 35: 21–37. doi:10.1017/S0959774324000118. ISSN 0959-7743.
  103. ^ Jacob, T. (1972). "The Problem of Head-Hunting and Brain-Eating among Pleistocene Men in Indonesia". Archaeology and Physical Anthropology in Oceania. 7 (2): 86–89. JSTOR 40386169.
  104. ^ Callaway, E. (2014). "Homo erectus made world's oldest doodle 500,000 years ago". Nature News. doi:10.1038/nature.2014.16477. S2CID 164153158.
  105. ^ a b Dickson, D. B. (1992). The Dawn of Belief: Religion in the Upper Paleolithic of Southwestern Europe. University of Arizona Press. pp. 40–46. ISBN 978-0-8165-1336-9.
  106. ^ Latimer, B.; Ohman, J. (2001). "Axial dysplasia in Homo erectus". Journal of Human Evolution. 40.
  107. ^ Schiess, R.; Haeusler, M. (2013). "No skeletal dysplasia in the Nariokotome boy KNM-WT 15000 (Homo erectus)--a reassessment of congenital pathologies of the vertebral column". American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 150 (3): 365–374. doi:10.1002/ajpa.22211. PMID 23283736.
  108. ^ Urciuoli, A.; Kubat, J.; Schisanowski, L.; Schrenk, F.; Zipfel, B.; Tawane, M.; Bam, L.; Alba, D. M.; Kullmer, O. (2022). "Cochlear morphology of Indonesian Homo erectus from Sangiran". Journal of Human Evolution. 165 103163. Bibcode:2022JHumE.16503163U. doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2022.103163. PMID 35299091.
  109. ^ Hillert, D. G. (2015). "On the Evolving Biology of Language". Frontiers in Psychology. 6: 1796. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01796. PMC 4656830. PMID 26635694.

Bibliography

[edit]
[edit]
琏是什么意思 牙疼吃什么消炎药 黄鼠狼的天敌是什么动物 健康四大基石是什么 跑步后尿血是什么情况
什么是耽美 怀孕吃什么菜最有营养 小暑大暑是什么意思 什么之交 grace什么意思
这是什么字 洁面液是干什么用的 什么是蛋白质 伤感是什么意思 牙合是什么字
心脑血管挂什么科 人中起痘痘是什么原因 更年期失眠吃什么药 ido是什么意思 孕妇喝椰子水有什么好处
露水夫妻是什么意思hcv8jop1ns9r.cn 血脂高可以吃什么水果hcv9jop0ns7r.cn 低钙血症是什么意思96micro.com 郑和是什么族hcv7jop6ns9r.cn 比翼双飞是什么意思hcv7jop9ns0r.cn
什么气味能驱赶猫hcv8jop8ns8r.cn 合伙人是什么意思hcv9jop2ns3r.cn 钩针ch是什么意思hcv8jop8ns3r.cn 扁桃体发炎不能吃什么东西fenrenren.com k金是什么hcv9jop0ns3r.cn
有妇之夫是什么意思hcv8jop5ns6r.cn 睡美人最怕什么脑筋急转弯0735v.com 什么的沙滩hcv9jop2ns0r.cn 检查耳朵挂什么科hcv9jop2ns8r.cn 甲氧氯普胺片又叫什么hcv9jop5ns7r.cn
哼唧是什么意思hcv8jop4ns3r.cn 知了为什么叫hcv9jop5ns5r.cn 印鉴是什么意思hcv7jop5ns3r.cn 今年是农历的什么年jingluanji.com 龙的九个儿子都叫什么名字zsyouku.com
百度